Home / Uncategorized / Revisiting And Reviewing My Worldview Within The Physical Sciences

Revisiting And Reviewing My Worldview Within The Physical Sciences

Once in a while I think that its helpful to plot the different odds and ends that are a vital part of my general perspective, in any event to the extent material science, cosmology and in general the idea of the truth is concerned. Here’s my most recent advertising.


Causality is outright. For each effect(s) there is a cause(s) which went before it. Every single reason is in itself an impact that was caused by a much increasingly past reason, etc without any end in sight causality goes.

The upshot of all that will be that total causality suggests that the Cosmos is a Deterministic Cosmos. Our Universe is for sure a Clockwork Universe. The inquiry remains anyway regardless of whether the presence of life (i.e. – Free Will) stuffs up those deterministic works.

Which thus prompts the inquiry regardless of whether Consciousness and somewhere around a restricted type of Free Will (only one that is either) lives in the lifeless and also in the enliven odds and ends of the Cosmos. This Universal Consciousness, referred to likewise as Panpsychism, goes far to clarifying quantum mechanics, IMHO.

Following on from the idea of supreme causality, since the Big Bang occasion was an impact, it pursues that it more likely than not had a cause(s) that went before it. Subsequently, there was a BEFORE the Big Bang.

The Big Bang occasion was similar to a stage progress, however it’s obscure if that change resembled ice to water to ice, or increasingly much the same as ‘lead’ to a grandiose quark-and-electron-soup to ‘gold’. At the end of the day, is our Universe likened to the universe which gone before it?

The Universal Constants of nature (counting those laws, standards and connections of material science) probably won’t be – steady that it. Be that as it may, in the event that there has been change over those vast ages, it has been a deterministic one.

There is both Something and Nothing so as to take into consideration movement to happen. In the event that everything were a something there would be no vacant space for movement to occur into.

Preservation of issue/vitality (electric charge; force) is total. Whatever is on the left half of the condition will approach whatever is on the correct side of the condition.

Following on from that, it is incomprehensible, even in principle, for there to be any Creation of an Absolute Something from an Absolute Nothing. The upshot of that will be that issue/vitality has dependably existed and in this way the universe had no beginning; no creation and subsequently is boundlessly old.

That nix on something from nothing additionally discounts Dark Energy as a feasible idea and thus the Universe isn’t quickening its development rate. There must be another clarification.

As a minor departure from the inconceivability of making something from nothing topic, ‘something’ Non-Physical can’t make or communicate with something that is Physical.

Space isn’t a functioning, dynamic, bending, twisting, bending, or elastic like something. Space is only a psychological idea – the envisioned compartment genuine stuff (like planets, stars, systems, and so forth.) dwells in. Things with structure and substance travel THROUGH the void, vacancy, vacuum, nothingness that is space, not ON space.

Time isn’t a something either. Time is another psychological idea we dole out rate or change (or movement) to. No movement implies no change and accordingly that would make or render the idea of time trivial.

Since Time and Space are absolutely mental builds, there are no such things as entirely genuine Dimensions. Measurements also are mental ideas that simply enable us to explore our way around the universe. Measurements are grandiose topography; enormous scope and longitude.

Likelihood is another psychological idea we dole out to vulnerability. In actuality there is no real likelihood or vulnerability, regardless of whether reality places confinements on what we can watch. Something either IS or IS NOT.

Movement is presumably the most crucial property an integral part of enormous stuff.

Interminability as characterized by me is a down to earth definition rather than a numerical or philosophical definition. My Infinity implies that regardless of how far you can go through space or potentially through time, you can generally travel further.

Talking about definitions, Cosmos is every one of that was, is or ever will be; Universe implies our Universe; universe(s) implies some different universe(s).

With regards to the genuine idea of Reality, there appears to be some level of ‘wise’ structure or tweaking fused into the laws, standards and connections of material science. I discount an all-omni heavenly Maximally Greatest Being; supplanting same with a Supreme Computer Software Programmer who is definitely not all-omni. At the end of the day, the chances are high that we ‘exist’ as virtual creatures in a reproduced scene, also called the Simulation Hypothesis.


The Cosmos, every one of that was, is or ever will be, is a definitive shut framework. Nothing gets in and nothing gets out. The substance are settled.

Because the Cosmos is interminable in term doesn’t mean the make a difference/vitality substance are likewise boundless. A boundless measure of stuff in the Cosmos means the world is a something and hence movement is beyond the realm of imagination.

In this way, the substance of the Cosmos are limited. Since the Cosmos has vast term, which implies that each conceivable design of issue/vitality will happen at some point or another. Each conceivable setup would subsequently likewise need to rehash, a few arrangements maybe more than others; maybe not.

The upshot is, whatever it is that you are doing, you’ve done it previously – a vast number of times previously – and you’ll do it an unending number of times in the limitless future.

The Cosmos, and even any universes contained inside, might hence not be cyclic in the conventional sense – Big Bang – Big Crunch – Big Bang – Big Crunch – Big Bang, and so on. Or maybe it’s a general situation of what circumvents comes around once more, and once more, and once more.

Peculiarities (A Partial List!)

Dark Holes. Reason: The power of Gravity inside the Black Hole’s occasion skyline would in itself keep the Black Hole’s gravity from ‘getting away’ and affecting the outside astronomical neighborhood. In the event that the Standard Model of Particle Physics is right, I neglect to perceive how a Black Hole can apply gravity. The Graviton, the molecule that conveys and passes on the gravitational power, much like the photon, couldn’t escape from inside the Black Hole itself.

Quantum Mechanics. Reason: How does a photon ‘know’ regardless of whether to go through a sheet of glass or reflect off of that sheet of glass? How does a rudimentary molecule ‘know’ if there would one say one is or two cuts open? How does a shaky core ‘know’ when the ball is in its court to ‘haphazardly’ rot and consequently maintain that half-life relationship? Where does an electron go when it quantum bounces between permitted vitality states?

Straightforwardness. Reason: Take a one millimeter thick layer of unadulterated coal; of unadulterated graphite; and of unadulterated jewel. All are made out of just carbon molecules, yet only one (the jewel) is straightforward, or possibly translucent. For what reason is that?

Science. Reason: The properties of table salt are amazingly not quite the same as that of its constituents (chlorine and sodium). However no additional enchanted fixing has been included or subtracted.

Scientific Equations. Reason: Why are coefficients about all around entire numbers, generally only one however almost in every case under five (as in X, or 2X, or 4X) as appeared by Newton’s second law of movement (F = mama)? For what reason are the types about all around entire numbers, normally two (something squared) as in the Pythagorean Theorem? As on account of the Pythagorean Theorem, once in a while it’s both. That additionally the case in Einstein’s connection among mass and vitality or as in Newton’s law of all inclusive attractive energy. For what reason are these conditions so essential yet so basic that even a middle school understudy ought to have the capacity to unravel them? Definitely Mother Nature didn’t need to be like this. It’s anything but difficult to imagine a tremendously progressively complex arrangement of connections. For what reason hasn’t that occurred? Some place along the line ‘plan’ is by all accounts included.


The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Reason: The making of something from nothing trillions of times over, consistently inside and out.

The Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Reason: Reality isn’t onlooker subordinate. There is no likelihood. There is no superposition-of-state. There is no fall of any wave-work. Schrodinger’s Cat is EITHER in any condition, full stop.

Distorted Space. Reason: Things seem to go through space, not on space, and travel through space unhindered. On the off chance that space is truly a something with structure and of substance, no one has possessed the capacity to put some on the piece in the lab for examination. You can’t see or generally recognize space even with cutting edge instrumentation. In the event that things ride on a dynamic, dynamic, distorted, curving, adaptable, elastic like space which is the acknowledged situation at that point there ought to be a type of recognizable interface among space and those things – like those worlds riding piggy-back on the structure of room. There isn’t.

Additional Dimensions. Reason: The idea of dimensionality is only a human creation that causes us explore around. In the event that 3-D has no reality, it has no structure and substance, any extra measurements similarly has no reality. Defenders of additional measurements very advantageously have them nestled into so absolutely infinitesimal that nobody can see or distinguish them.

String Theory and Branes. Reason: Despite multi-many years of pontificating about String Theory, or Superstring Theory or M-Theory or Branes, every one of those a large number of string hypothesis physicists still can’t seem to put one exploratory confirmation on the scoreboard.

Super-Symmetry. Reason: There’s been no trial check of the presence of super-symmetric accomplices to all the known Standard Model basic particles.

Production of Something from Nothing. Reason: No one, past or present, has ever made something from nothing

next post

About MianG

Check Also

Two Science-Art Philosophies – Utopia or Oblivion?

A notice to the peruser: This article contends that cutting edge science has been flipped …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *